Wikipedia has too many ignorant & intolerant half-wit editors whose personal views are more important than simple facts.

Previous problems revolved around Ignorant Edit Bullies. Now it's all completely political. Extremist nutjobs are taking over.

It seems that there's no way to fight it either. They Manipulate Wikipedia's Rules, say "No, I didn't", get one of their co-crybabies to agree, and that's the end of that.

I suggest you read wikipedia for the references only and completely disregard the articles because they are carefully tailored and censored to meet the author's point of view. See Emma Weyant (revision history and the braindamage done by morons like Egsan Bacon and Morbidthoughts followed by opinions on law by clearly-professional lawyers like Beccaynr. And just as important, don't consider the references complete. Lots of information/facts are censored and removed after a page is updated with valid/correct information -- so go through the revision history of pages as well.

Seriously, Look at the user pages of Egsan Bacon (archive), Beccaynr (archive), and TenorTwelve (archive) and then contemplate the real reason they are censoring certain content on Emma Weyant's page.

So there's my opinion. I'm not sure if my own talk page will be censored. but in case it is-- here's a link to what was written, content set in stone, that will be available on the internet forever (coming soon).